Playing on the word "nomenclature", the name Nomenculture sums up our mission rather perfectly: To comment on the specialized profession of brand-naming and observe the way in which brand-names broadly affect culture. This blog is published by The Naming Group, a New York City-based brand-naming agency. www.thenaminggroup.com


Showing posts with label company renaming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label company renaming. Show all posts

Why ‘the Y’ Works


On Monday, the YMCA announced that it is shortening its name to ‘the Y.’ Given the 166-year heritage behind the Young Men’s Christian Association, some argue that the name change throws away valuable brand equity, including that gained from the enduring Village People single and its subsequent arm motions.

Oppositely, this strategic name shift doesn’t toss the brand’s heritage; it extracts the most valuable element, renovating the name for the modern context, retaining the equity that lies in the YMCA brand and building on it.

The brand’s name shift to ‘the Y’ exemplifies one of the core beliefs held by The Naming Group: the prefix “re-“—as in “rename” or “rebrand”—suggests starting from scratch, indeed squandering precious equity. This example supports our outlook that naming is more accurately a transition—a Brandsition, as we call it—from once-relevant elements to ones that fit the updated context and exhibit a timeless quality.

Formerly-known-as-the-YMCA chief marketing officer Kate Coleman hit the nail on the head by saying, “It’s a way of being warmer, more genuine, more welcoming when you call yourself what everyone else calls you.” What eloquence!

Other iconic brands prove Coleman’s premise. Coke, for example, retains the Americana heritage of its namesake Coca-Cola and lends the Coca-Cola brand some modernity and applicability to evolving generations. When Federal Express slimmed the brand name down to its epithet ‘FedEx’ in 2000, it adapted to the shorthand name used by the company’s customers yet preserved the brand identity. Let us also recall the recent buzz around Chevrolet and the sales and marketing VPs asking that employees refer to the automaker by its full name instead of ‘Chevy;’ most agree that avoiding the nickname that customers revere was going to be a bad move.

The key is in the tail end of Coleman’s statement: “what everyone else calls you.” Branding from the basis of a fabricated nickname will never have the same effect, as we are learning from Radio Shack’s new positioning, ‘The Shack.’ The company’s customers have never referred to it as the Shack, so instead of building an association between the name and the store the new name abandons the brand equity accrued over time.

The naming lesson learned is to choose critically when updating the title of an existing brand. The foremost goal must be to protect brand equity by creating a cognitive bridge between the ‘old’ and new. The Y has adapted a colloquial name—one that is already highly recognizable and used by its patrons—so, lucky for them, the bulk of the Brandsition work is done!

What the news means for the Village People? In a press release, the group stated, "We are deeply dismayed by today's announcement...while we admire the organization for the work they do, we still can’t help but wonder Y.” Two words: new single.

Russian Apple Carts and Renaming Mitsubishi - PRESS PREVIEW DAY @ THE 2010 NEW YORK AUTO SHOW

Aaaaaand the Greatest Name Fail of the 2010 Auto Show and Worst Customer Service Awards both go to… Mitsubishi! Come on down!

Introducing Mitsubishi’s Zero Emission’s Vehicle, the “iMiev”. Before we go any further “miev” means stinky in German, not cool. Especially not in the auto making business when some of the strongest brands in the world are German. “iMiev” stands for Mitsubishi Innovative Electric Vehicle. The “i” that precedes “miev” stands for the “i” series of compact Mitsubishi cars in Japan, clearly a rip off from Apple’s branding. We even asked, “Wait, so does the ‘i’ stand for anything? Interactive? Anything at all?” Response, “Nope. Just an ‘i’.”
Although I was very impressed with the technology, unique design, and the enthusiastic pitch by the great Mitsubishi PR man, we’ll call him Ricky Real-Deal, the only triggers “i Miev” sparked in my head were, Apple and Russia. “Have you seen Apple’s new Russian scooter?” “You mean the iMiev, right?”

Ricky Real-Deal, told us openly, “I think the name sucks.” Thank you! An enthusiastic brand representative that is able to admit obvious fault while not jeopardizing his allegiance to the product and company. Big ups to you, Ricky. He then graciously passed us along to the PR rep so that we could get to talking.

Enter Linda Lame-o (name has been changed, but still fitting), who could barely finish a sentence without saying “um like” or “I don’t know.” Even worse, she was chilly, unkind, unhelpful and quite possibly the worst brand ambassador a company could hope for.

Linda, here is our card; you suck, you car name sucks, Ricky’s cool, stay green, and call us when your cerebral cortex returns from vacation.

Renaming help? How about Mitsubitchi?

Renaming a Company: Creating a Smooth Brandsition®

If we started to collect a nickel for every inquiry asking us if we offer renaming or rebranding services, The Naming Group would experience quite the spike in revenue this year. Do we offer rebranding and renaming? We don’t. We offer Brandsition® services. At The Naming Group, we believe that "renaming" and "rebranding" are outdated and inflexible terms. It’s that “re-“ prefix! To us, it implies a do-over or starting from scratch. When we are developing a new name for a preexisting company or product, we never start from scratch.

The concept of a Brandsition® stretches beyond developing new names for preexisting entities. It applies numerous branding scenarios such as:
- Building sub-brands beneath an established parent brand
- Developing line-extensions
- Proposing to reach a new target demographic
- Corporate expansion in a new direction (environmental consciousness, philanthropy, affordability)

The driving force behind a Brandsition® is to simultaneously revive and preserve a brand. A shiny new name is only as strong as the brand equity upon which it is built. It is important to identify and modify what has not been successful thus far, while also preserving the brand elements that are in good working order.

For instance, Epson’s latest product launch, “BrightLink” is a perfect example of a successful Brandsition® (forgive our bias - while at a former agency, The Naming Group members worked on BrightLink name development). For years, Epson has had an innovative educational program called “Brighter Futures” which they define as “a unique sales and support initiative…designed to help educators select and implement the best products for their classrooms while making the most of their budgets.” Given that the “BrightLink” projector will forever change the classroom landscape it only made sense to have the product name speak to “Brighter Futures.”

Read more about Brandsition® here.